18
Jan
09

So I got a Macro…

dsc01710

…lens.

Since buying my camera I never really felt the need to get a new lens. I was happy with the kit lens (18mm – 70mm f/3.5) that came with my Sony Alpha 200 dslr. A basic camera with a basic setup, good enough for my initial needs as I just upgraded from a camera phone point and shoot.

dsc01807

I remember my first ever shot was the Creator’s Labo Rei Ayanami. It looked gorgeous, and HDR was just pure eye candy. Over time though, I felt like I needed something more…not better or bigger…just more.

dsc01810

Now the kit lens serves me fine for normal photography but I didn’t get some shots like I wanted to. Not much bokeh (blurry effect in the background) on the f/3.5 kit lens, so I needed a higher aperture for sure. I considered getting a ‘prime lens’ first (standard 50mm). An f/1.4 aperture would mean beautiful bokeh and great night shots (aperture is big enough to let in more light). Even portrait shots would look great due to the shallow depth of field since the background of the subject is all out of focus, so the viewer pays more attention to the subject.

dsc01820

However, the prime lens would not have given me the in-your-face big macro shots that I wanted, not to mention the sharpness. Secondly, the macro lens would suffice for good portrait shots as well.

dsc01824

I’m not really into landscape shots that much, so for the time being I don’t feel the need for a wide-angle or telephoto lens as the standard kit lens serves me just fine. So after much asking around, I was advised by friends to get a Macro lens. I got the Sigma 105mm f/2.8  EX DG Macro lens. Also a UV filter (by Sigma) to keep the lens dust-free.

dsc017551

Funny thing is, that the Cloud Strife and Hardy-Daytona figure was the catalyst for me to get this lens, yet I didn’t feel like taking Macro shots of it. Cloud doesn’t need that much attention and the bike is the star attraction imo.

dsc01776

So anyways I started experimenting a bit and took some macro shots of figures I’ve already featured. While this proved to be extremely satisfying, portrait shots were not so great. Thing is, this lens is so damn sharp, that on adults, each and every wrinkle, skin marks, pores, etc. stand out. The backgrounds are nicely blurred, but the subject matter itself doesn’t look good…at all! That said, kids would be wonderful subjects due to their smooth skin. I haven’t had a chance to snap portrait shots of kids myself, but Flickr results prove my theory correct.

dsc01814

Don’t be fooled by these shots thinking this was easy. Using a macro lens forced me to use my camera in full Manual mode which was a good side effect, but manual focusing with the lens is a bitch! There’s absolutely no way for me to get the shots just the way I want with the Auto-focus. Often times the AF would focus the hair or some other part of the figure when all I really wanted was the focus on their eyes. Patience in macro photography is definitely a virtue, with sweet results!

dsc01816

All things considered, I’m glad I purchased the lens (for AED 1,450/ USD 395) and discovering new ways of photography. The level of detail in a full resolution picture is insane (I have cropped all images to 50% ). Next up, the 50mm Prime lens!

dsc01827

PS: in some pics you will see the dust problem I keep on crying about. Shots were taken just after dusting my entire room!


7 Responses to “So I got a Macro…”


  1. 1 MJ
    January 18, 2009 at 9:43 pm

    Nice Cloud Strife Figure!!

  2. January 24, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    i know, macro lens rock

    i have a minolta 35-70 mm with macro, and a 50mm prime lens

    • 3 th
      January 24, 2009 at 11:08 pm

      The 50mm Prime is a sweet lens. I tried looking for the Minolta lens but couldn’t find any in the market. The hunt continues.

      A friend of mine recently got a Canon 5D Mark II. Jeezus that thing is amazing! Night shots (hand held) are totally insane!

      But too expensive for e :p

  3. January 28, 2009 at 3:17 am

    haha, my friend got the Nikon D90

    dude, the HD video in it is brilliant. the cameras kit lens is 18-105.

    I am thinking of selling my kit lens, and macro lens, and buying a 18-200mm lens with macro setting on it, but thing is, ITS bloody expensive

    also, TIP, before buying any lens, check it out on http://www.dyxum.com

  4. January 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

    and i also just purchased a minolta 35-105 lens for 49 dollars :D


Leave a Reply




deculture @ twitter

  • Wow, new Darker Than Black much better than I expected! 1 day ago
  • FF XIII on 9th March 2010!!!!!!!!!!!!! 3 days ago
  • Wow, didn't realise how pathetic electric stoves are until I cooked on one! 3 days ago
  • 2012: silly movie, but frickin' awesome! Must see on the big screen! 4 days ago

Help us help you!

wordpress visitor